1.) Which is better ethically, particularly in reference to the trolley problem: doing right or NOT doing wrong? 2.) Does the morality of others help dictate our own morality?

3.) Thomas Cathcart once said, "A sadist (someone who likes to inflict pain) is a masochist (someone who likes to receive pain) who follows the Golden Rule." How does this apply to the Joker and what does this do to our understanding of the Golden Rule?

4.) Apply the trolley problem to the Batman and Redhood dilemma. What ethical decision did Batman chose at the very end of the clip?

if interdependence implies a two-way dependence, and if each partner is equally dependent on the other for success, then there is an equal commitment to the making the partnership successful. the advantage is sustainability of the relationship, the disadvantage is that decisions are "democratic" and therefore may take longer to reach and more likely to be a compromise (which is not always the best solution). as the interdependence moves away from equality, the decisions become more influenced by the more independent partner. in the extreme the relationship becomes more dictatorial and more like "master-slave". generally the relationship has less commitment in both directions and is more likely to be temporary.

if one generalizes (and one shouldn't), equity partnerships, which is probably what is implied by interdependence, can be slow to progress or change but durable. the extreme alternative, independent-dependent partnerships tend to be efficient but more fragile.

hope this but you will have to site your own evidence. : )

where is the map so i can

the answer to your question is,

d. when a child was born.

-mabel < 3

answer; answer; marginal cost;