The government of Lizzandria wants to draft a new constitution that provides the maximum amount of liberty to its citizens, while also creating three branches of government (legislative, judicial, and executive). So far, the constitution gives the President of Lizandria, whom the citizens elect, absolute power over the legislative and judicial branches. What changes would Baron de Montesquieu suggest be made to the constitution of Lizzandria?

A.
He would recommend that the government of Lizzandria vest the majority of power in the legislative and judicial branches.
B.
He would suggest that the government of Lizzandria establish a monarchy to ensure that the basic services are provided to the people.
C.
He would recommend that the government have a system of checks and balances to ensure that no single branch has absolute power over another.
D.
He would advise the government of Lizzandria to maintain a strong presidency to ensure that the natural rights of its people are protected from a corrupt judiciary.

No links!!!

I think it's C soory if you get it wrong

soothing tone) but quickly, the tone changes from a light tone to a grim one. by introducing disturbing word choices that are illogical.make a list of some of levertov’s images of war from both of her poems. how do her wordsaffect you? do you agree with her position on war? write a short response (at least 100 words) and support your answer with personal experience or your studiespoets can change the tone in a poem, and levertov does when the she refers to "delicate man . .whose eyes/are flowers that perceive the stars”. the word choices here are different. theimages began to show feelings of hope/potential. but this mood is interrupted with the dark oppressive words "entrails of still-alive babies" and "carcass-gulleys". levertov continues to switch tones by "the deep intelligence living at peace would have"—one is left with a sense of hope. i can connect with her words that humans can do better things than fight in war. we only have one life so dying in a war would be for no reason. also, i am a christian and in the bible, it says "thou shall not kill", and i strongly believe in that.people respond differently to satire—some like it, others don't get it. in at least 150 words, describe what you think of goines's narrative essay. discuss whether you think his position is convincing.the satire kept people's attention, rather than just rambling. instead of being dead serious, he adds humor to enlighten it. i think he did a good job of proving his point, but convincing people to stray from their own beliefs is hard, and satire can be offensive to that person. overall i think that goines's narrative essay was good because narrative essay create deeper understanding. i also like that the narrative essay is in first-person. the essay was filled with diction and word choice to let you know that the essay is going to be witty yet satirical. his point was to write  

explanation: