A company makes a bracelet containing magnets that they claim improves balance and overall athletic performance. Researchers recruit volunteers for an experiment. The subjects will test the effectiveness of the bracelet by performing a variety of athletic challenges with and without the bracelet. Each subject will do each challenge 333 times: wearing the actual bracelet, wearing a placebo bracelet, and wearing no bracelet at all. The order will be randomized for each activity, subjects won't know which bracelet is which. Required:
Why did the researchers include the scenario where subjects wear no bracelet at all?

why does vagina taste like fish water (asking for a friend)

responsibilities im assuming

question - in 1827, john walker, a druggist in a small english town, tipped a splint with sulphur, chlorate of potash, and sulphid of antimony, and rubbed it on sandpaper, and it burst into flame. the druggist had discovered the first friction-chemical match, the kind we use to-day. it is called friction-chemical because it is made by mixing certain chemicals together and rubbing them. although walker's match did not require the bottle of acid, nevertheless it was not a good one. it could be lighted only by hard rubbing, and it sputtered and threw fire in all directions. in a few years, however, phosphorus was substituted on the tip for antimony, and the change worked wonders. the match could now be lighted with very little rubbing, and it was no longer necessary to have sandpaper upon which to rub it. it would ignite when rubbed on any dry surface, and there was no longer any sputtering. this was the phosphorus match, the match with which we are so familiar. according the paragraph what was the benefit of the new phosphorus match? it burst into flame when rubbed on sandpaper. it was made by mixing chemicals. it could be ignited on any dry surface. it threw fire in all directions.

answer - matches required natural chemicals

answer; /// the need to make choices because economic wants exceed economic means;