Your text states that although not used in a systematic manner in the 1990s, outcome assessment began playing a critical role in clinical care, and became interested in identifying those clients who would not benefit from psychotherapy.

Me ☺️ i would appreciate it. “ explain who the following groups were: a)federalist b) anti-federalist” i really need

For each of the following, mark whether it is a possible confounder (a factor that mixes up the results, making it look like candy is to blame when it's a causal (or causation) link which supports the argument that candy causes criminal behavior (ie, explains how candy leads to criminality ), or neither (an irrelevant factor, something that may cause people to become criminals but has nothing to do with eating candy). choose your answers based only< on the information given. additives in candy- additives found in candy may adversely affect brain development of young children in ways that could contribute towards adult aggression. impulsive personality-- kids who are highly impulsive and have trouble delaying gratification are more likely to eat candy every day as children and more likely to disobey laws as adults. violent abuse-- children who suffer violent abuse are more likely to become violent adults and commit violent crimes. gender- boys are overwhelmingly more likely to commit violent crimes

2. when a government has total control over its citizens, including the media, it is a of government question 2 options: constitutional monarchy parliamentary democracy autocracy presidential democracy