How can corruption be eliminated from the soci CIAA is established as constitutional organ to check corruption but corrupion is still increasing day by day instead of decreasing. Why?..

Me! will give brainliest to whoever answers correctly! arrange the events in peruvian history in chronological order using the numbers 1-6. a. simón bolívar and antonio jóse de sucre’s defeat of spanish forces ensures peru’s independence. b. alejandro toledo is the first indigenous peruvian elected president. c. spanish conquistador francisco pizarro arrives in peru and enslaves peru's indigenous people. d. túpac amaru ii is executed, and his sacrifice inspires peruvians to seek independence and equal rights for indigenous people. e. the chaví­n culture establishes settlements high in the andes. f. attacks by rebel groups threaten democratic rule. (for example, find out the dates of the events (years) and and list them below) you for your time!

Using the president's schedule, identify one example of the president using constitutional powers and fulfilling his duties. then, explain how and why that power is limited. give your answer in the form of at least three complete sentences.

Research and review one of the following cases: 1. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc. 2. young vs ups 3. vance vs ball state university after you have thought through and understand the case answer the following: 1. explain the facts of the case leading to the dispute. 2. define and show understanding of each of the terms assigned to your case. break the laws into components where necessary. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) disparate treatment discrimination, 4)disparate impact discrimination vance vs ball state university: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) hostile work environment, 4) a supervisor for title vii purposes young vs ups: 1) title vii, 2) pregnancy discrimination act, 3)american's with disabilities act, 4) reasonable accommodation 3.how do the above concepts come into play in the case? 4. what rule of law came from the case? what did the court decide? 5. based on your understanding of employment law was the ruling correct? explain using a legal principle.