Performing library searches that lead us to read lots of different sources (some of which may only be tangentially related to our topic), then reflecting on what we've read, and coming up with new connections and deeper insight: a) is an example of the inefficiency of traditional, pre-internet methods of doing research.
b) characterizes the way most research is done today.
c) is something that can now be accomplished better by Googling.
d) describes the process known as 'marinating'.

Based on your approved case, create fictitious digital evidence. you may use logs from your own computer (no personal information) as a guide or search the internet for samples. these samples do not have to be technically correct, but there must be a reasonable presumption that this information would exist, supported by a reference. document who, when, and how the evidence was obtained. remember, you are creating fictitious examples, so refer to prior reading or examples of how digital evidence was collected. if necessary, refer to the "who" as a "systems administrator" and ensure the fictitious person is identified and referenced in your investigation. digital evidence must meet each of the following criteria: some of your digital evidence must be retrieved by computer forensics. some of your digital evidence must be retrieved from log files. digital evidence must contain information to support who, what, when, where, and how the cyber-crime was committed. present digital copies of your evidence in text files, screen shots, or pdfs.

The biggest component / ingredient of summer time smog is

What do supreme court decisions based on the first amendment usually involve?