subject
Social Studies, 13.12.2021 21:50 wiredq2049

Redactează un text de 5-10 rânduri în care să prezinți cel puțin două argumente sau exemple care să susțină proverbul ”Ce ție nu-ți place, altuia nu-i face!”

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 09:00
What happened in georgia as a result of the supreme court ruling in brown v. board of education? question 3 options: the sibley commission was formed all public schools were desegregated the southern christian leadership was formed the general assembly passed laws to keep schools segregated.
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 09:40
Compared with the executive and legislative branches
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 06:00
Ahusband who believed that his wife was having an affair with his brother hired an arsonist to burn down the brother's house. they planned for the husband to take his brother to a ballgame so that the arsonist would be able to set the house on fire without detection. after the husband and brother left for the ballgame, however, the arsonist decided to abandon the plan and immediately left town without doing anything further. when the husband returned from the ballgame with the brother, he saw the house still standing and blurted out what was supposed to have happened. the husband and the arsonist were arrested and charged with conspiracy to commit arson. at the arsonist's trial, his attorney argued that he was innocent of the conspiracy because he decided not to go ahead with the plan, and nothing criminal had in fact occurred.at common law, how should a jury find the arsonist? a not guilty of conspiracy, because going to a ballgame is not a criminal overt act.b not guilty of conspiracy, because the husband, not the arsonist, committed the overt act.c guilty, because the husband executed his part of the plan.d guilty, because the arsonist agreed to set the brother's house on fire.
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 07:30
Recall that in one condition of the experiment conducted by stasser and titus (1985) about student council president candidates, all group members had access to the same information, and that in another condition, members had unique information that other group members didn't know. in the second (unshared information) condition, the group made a worse decision than in the first (shared information) condition. this occurred because groups seldom can agree on who is most expert. focus discussion on the information that all members know. often ignore dissenting opinions. avoid differences of opinion, given conformity pressures.
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Redactează un text de 5-10 rânduri în care să prezinți cel puțin două argumente sau exemple care să...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 04.05.2021 01:00
question
Mathematics, 04.05.2021 01:00
question
Mathematics, 04.05.2021 01:00
question
English, 04.05.2021 01:00
question
Mathematics, 04.05.2021 01:00
question
Health, 04.05.2021 01:00
Questions on the website: 13722362