1. What was the relationship between the East India Company (EIC) and the British government? How was the EIC able to wield so much power? 2. Does the painting of the granting of Diwani reflect the true story of what happened? Why might this scene be painted this way?
3. During the Victorian period (1820-1914) many ignored the negative aspects of British colonialism in India. Why?
4. Describe India during the height of the Mughal Empire's power. How did the relationship between India and England begin? How did this lead to the founding of the EIC?
5. What allowed for the rise of the EIC and the fall of the Mughal Empire? On a global scale what changed in respect to the relationship between the East and West?
6. When the EIC encountered financial difficulties, how did the British government respond?
7. How did the EIC eventually fall out of favor with the British Parliament? (make sure to answer this thoroughly!)
8. By studying the East India Company, what warnings can we take with us in regards to corporate power? (answer in a short paragraph).

Gettysburg address question. what is the purpose of this address?

Toward the end of the roman empire, what caused a decrease in the use of coined money tell me now

According to the world bank, e.u. remittances to senegal were $1,005,728,139$1,005,728,139 in 2015. senegal's gross domestic product (gdp) was $13,779,570,750$13,779,570,750 in 2015. what percentage of senegal's 2015 gdp is represented by the remittances? round your answer to one place after the decimal. remittances as percent of gdp: %% based on the washington post article, e.u. launches $2 billion plan to keep africans from migrating, which explanation correctly explains why senegal's government would or would not implement policies to restrict illegal migration from senegal to the european union? because remittances represent such a large percentage of senegal's gdp, senegal's government faces an incentive to do nothing to stop illegal migration to the european union. because remittances are sent from senegalese workers in senegal to their family members in the european union, senegal's government faces no incentive to crack down on illegal migration. because remittances represent such a small percentage of national income, senegal's government does not find it worth its time to implement policies to prevent illegal migration. because remittances are sent from senegalese workers in senegal to their family members in the european union, senegal's government faces a large incentive to crack down on illegal migration.