subject
Social Studies, 03.07.2019 16:40 lin550

Based on the essay’s central ideas, what is emerson trying to convince the reader to think or do? check all of the boxes that apply. go out into nature and commune with the divine experience real solitude to truly perceive nature take walks rarely in order not to tire of nature realize that individuals are meant to learn from nature and transcend it view nature on sunny days and avoid it on overcast days think of nature as a symbol of the divine

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 21.06.2019 21:30
The owner of a one-acre parcel of land with a small house on it rented the property to a professor of a nearby college at a monthly rental of $500. several years later, after the professor got tenure, the parties orally agreed that the professor would purchase the property from the owner for the sum of $60,000, payable at the rate of $500 a month for 10 years. they agreed that the owner would give the professor a deed to the property after five years had passed and $30,000 had been paid toward the purchase price, and that the professor would execute a note secured by a mortgage for the balance. the professor continued in possession of the property and made all monthly payments in a timely fashion. when he had paid $30,000, he tendered a proper note and mortgage to the property owner and demanded that she deliver the deed as agreed. the owner refused because valuable minerals had been discovered on adjacent parcels in recent months, causing the value of this parcel of land to increase to 10 times its former value. the professor brought suit against the property owner for specific performance. if the court rules in favor of the property owner, what is the likely reason?
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 13:00
Awoman was found strangled in the basement of her home where she lived with her husband. the crime scene was processed and investigators left. the next day, the medical examiner reported that a scalloped, woven belt was used to strangle the victim. the police asked the husband to search the house again to look for such a belt and he agreed. a belt was found that matched marks on the victim. the man was arrested. his attorney made a motion that the belt be excluded from the evidence as he contended that the search was not legal. which statement is true? a. the belt should be excluded because the search was not legal. the police did not obtain a search warrant, as needed according to the fourth amendment to the u.s. constitution. b. the belt is admissible because the man gave his consent to the second search. c. the belt should be excluded because the search was not legal. the police did not obtain a search warrant, as need according to michigan v. tyler. d. the belt is admissible as evidence, according to mincey v. arizona.
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 13:30
Calculate the iq of a 20 year old who has the mental age of 25
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 14:00
Restricting immigrants from entering a country may be based on what belief?  
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Based on the essay’s central ideas, what is emerson trying to convince the reader to think or do? c...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 03.07.2019 09:30
Questions on the website: 13722360