subject
Social Studies, 12.07.2019 14:40 Jadamachado45

Thad returns home from class on a hot summer's evening, turns on the air conditioner full blast, and sits down to watch television. his roommate sean returns home an hour later and wonders how thad can hear the television above the loud noise of the air conditioner. thad remarks that he doesn't even notice the sound. which process causes the air conditioner to seem louder to sean than to thad? ​ a. ​perception b. ​sensation c. ​transduction d. ​sensory adaptation

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 21.06.2019 20:00
Doing the text now can someone me
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 01:30
Aman is charged a fee by the city for having numerous broken cars and auto parts in his front yard. which of the following correctly best describes why the city punish him? he has committed a crime. he is in violation of a city statute. he has violated an amendment of the u.s. constitution. a judge has decided that he is in violation of civil law.
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 10:30
How did the rise to power and reign of alexander most affect greece
Answers: 3
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 05:30
Athief was passing by a house under construction when he noticed that the ladder being used by workers on the roof had copper braces supporting the rungs. after making sure that the workers on the roof could not see him, the thief used pliers that he had in his pocket to remove all of the copper braces that he could reach from the ground. a short time later, a worker climbed down the ladder and it collapsed. he fell to the ground and severely injured his back. the thief was apprehended a few hours later trying to sell the copper for scrap. a statute in the jurisdiction makes it a felony for "maliciously causing serious physical injury to another." the thief was charged with malicious injury under the statute and was also charged with larceny. after a jury trial in which the above facts were presented, he was convicted of both charges. if he appeals the conviction for the malicious injury charge on grounds of insufficient evidence, how should the court rule? a affirm the conviction, because the thief was engaged in criminal conduct at the time of the act that resulted in the injury. b affirm the conviction, because the jury could have found that the thief acted with malice. c reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief intended to injure anyone. d reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief bore any malice towards the workers on the roof.
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
Thad returns home from class on a hot summer's evening, turns on the air conditioner full blast, and...
Questions
question
Geography, 30.11.2021 18:40
Questions on the website: 13722362