subject
Social Studies, 15.07.2019 12:50 fhishy11

What was one economic effect of the french and indian war on american colonists? a.)many shipbuilders gained wealth as a result of supplying the military. b.)many farmers lost money when the military raided their crop stores. c.)many colonists gained greater wealth as the british lowered taxes. d.)many colonists lost money as british troops drove them from their homes. what is the answer

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 16:10
Which best explains why the supreme court’s decision in plessy v. ferguson was unconstitutional? the supreme court’s ruling allowed states to deny equal protection to any person within its jurisdiction. since the 14th amendment did not make concessions for people born outside the us, the supreme court’s decision could not be applied. the supreme court’s decision gave individual states the freedom to make their own laws in relation to non-whites. since segregation laws did not provide equal protections or liberties to non-whites, the ruling was not consistent with the 14th amendment.
Answers: 3
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 17:30
Giving into indirect pressure to change your behavior or thoughts is called?
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 05:00
Alarge new diamond mine has just opened and the price of diamonds has gone down since she has study economics is cecilia decides to buy diamond necklace and she knows that
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 05:30
Athief was passing by a house under construction when he noticed that the ladder being used by workers on the roof had copper braces supporting the rungs. after making sure that the workers on the roof could not see him, the thief used pliers that he had in his pocket to remove all of the copper braces that he could reach from the ground. a short time later, a worker climbed down the ladder and it collapsed. he fell to the ground and severely injured his back. the thief was apprehended a few hours later trying to sell the copper for scrap. a statute in the jurisdiction makes it a felony for "maliciously causing serious physical injury to another." the thief was charged with malicious injury under the statute and was also charged with larceny. after a jury trial in which the above facts were presented, he was convicted of both charges. if he appeals the conviction for the malicious injury charge on grounds of insufficient evidence, how should the court rule? a affirm the conviction, because the thief was engaged in criminal conduct at the time of the act that resulted in the injury. b affirm the conviction, because the jury could have found that the thief acted with malice. c reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief intended to injure anyone. d reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief bore any malice towards the workers on the roof.
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
What was one economic effect of the french and indian war on american colonists? a.)many shipbuilde...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 17.12.2020 19:30
question
Mathematics, 17.12.2020 19:30
question
Mathematics, 17.12.2020 19:30
Questions on the website: 13722363