Why do command economies believe that an authoritarian system is more efficient than the price system for allocating scarce resources?

Command economies believe that if resource allocation  (such as money, food, factories etc) are left in the hands of the private sector, greed and personal motives would ensure that the very few and powerful manage resources in a way that will make them rich and leave the poor, poorer.

Command economies believe that too ensure that every person, both rich or poor, equally benefit from a country's resources, the government intervention would be required to distribute food, create jobs, cap wages, import scare products and export local production.

In theory, the system helps to benefits the poor. In reality, command economics rarely ever work.

cannabis

explanation:

(assuming this is the us) google it. law states you can't have weed.