Who takes over if the arizona governor resigns in the middle of a term?

The second westward surge reached the: mississippi river, appalachian mountains, oregon territory

Research and review one of the following cases: 1. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc. 2. young vs ups 3. vance vs ball state university after you have thought through and understand the case answer the following: 1. explain the facts of the case leading to the dispute. 2. define and show understanding of each of the terms assigned to your case. break the laws into components where necessary. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) disparate treatment discrimination, 4)disparate impact discrimination vance vs ball state university: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) hostile work environment, 4) a supervisor for title vii purposes young vs ups: 1) title vii, 2) pregnancy discrimination act, 3)american's with disabilities act, 4) reasonable accommodation 3.how do the above concepts come into play in the case? 4. what rule of law came from the case? what did the court decide? 5. based on your understanding of employment law was the ruling correct? explain using a legal principle.

Amaster's degree candidate needs to conduct a research project for her master's thesis. she is interested in the types of junk food available to the public. she plans on going to the local convenience stores and asking the owners what types of junk food the store normally stocks and which are the biggest sellers. identifiers will not be collected. this study would fall under which of the following? a. expedited review b. exempt review c. full board review d. not human subjects