Give examples of domestic policies that tend to support equality of opportunity and examples of policies aiming at equality of outcome. what ideologies may explain support for these two different goals?

1. Characterize balance of opportunity as the disposal of counterfeit hindrances to opportunities, and characterize equity of results as equivalent sharing of wage and material products.

2. Feature one case of a strategy supporting equity of opportunity, for example, integration, and one case of a policy supporting fairness of results, for example, dynamic income taxes.

3. Clarify how and why traditionalist and liberal philosophies would either bolster or restrict every case.

answer; analytical,creative and practical;

panem is a communist totalitarian dictatorship where all the resources and how they are allocated belongs to the capitol. the districts exist only to provide goods and services for the capital and most of the citizens live in poverty. it is a police state where the "peacekeepers" use force and threats to keep the people under control. dissent is outlawed and those who disobey the law are executed, flogged, or turned into avoxes. the games are another means in which the ruling elite in the capitol exert their power over the districts. when reading the books i drew parallels between panem and the soviet union and north korea. in no way is panem capitalist. the people in the capitol are wealthy but the majority of them are involved in the government somehow. it was the same way in the former soviet union where bigwigs in the communist party and high ranking government officials were given access to goods, services, medical treatments not available to the general public. if you think panem has a capitalist economy you need to brush up on your economics.