subject
Social Studies, 23.07.2019 17:00 LeilaniCo

You are a prosecutor preparing a case. the facts of the case support a charge of either capital murder or first-degree murder, but you are not sure how you feel about the morality of the death penalty. you have asked for opinions from other prosecutors in your office. as you consider your options, the court-appointed psychiatrist calls and tells you that he has examined the defendant and finds him to be severely developmentally challenged. the psychiatrist estimates the defendant's iq to be in the 60's and recommends that you seek his school or medical records to find more information. you decide that, given this information, an attempt to seek the death penalty would not be legally supported, based on the decision.

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 12:00
Popular culture mainly encompasses the realm of
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 19:30
What conflict ended the false doctrine of "states rights"
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 02:00
Peggy feels sorry for smokers who have lung cancer because she believes they were duped by tobacco companies to develop a deadly addiction and are therefore not responsible for their disease. when asked to donate money to support lung cancer research, peggy gives generously. peggy’s prosocial behavior can best be explained by the arousal: cost-reward model. the negative state relief model. a norm of equity. attributions of responsibility.
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 03:30
The platt amendment was a treaty that allowed the united states to build military bases in which country?
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
You are a prosecutor preparing a case. the facts of the case support a charge of either capital murd...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 05.06.2020 04:00
question
Mathematics, 05.06.2020 04:00
question
English, 05.06.2020 04:00
Questions on the website: 13722363