Mwhat does resilience means?

Read the excerpt from monster. petrocelli then he must have lied, is that right? o’brien objection. the prosecution is soliciting an argument. petrocelli withdrawn. mr. harmon, you say you weren’t at the drugstore anytime during the day of the robbery. perhaps you would tell us where you were. based on this dialogue, what can the reader infer? this is petrocelli's first time acting as the prosecuting attorney in a court of law. mr. harmon knows where he was during the day of the robbery. it is a rule of the court that a lawyer may not argue with someone during questioning. petrocelli has not been a trial lawyer as long as o'brien has.

Hola necesito que me ayuden mi profesor me mando hacer una carta y en la carta tengo que poner ¿por que quiero que me suba3 puntos? y dijo que de los 4 argumentos escoja una y que con ese argumento escriba la carta estos son los argumentos: adición: además eso, aun que, también. comparación: más que, menos que, tanto como. oposición: pero, sin embargo. seguridad: sin duda, por supuesto. esos son los 4 argumentos y tengo que escoger solo uno por favor lo necesito es muy urgente gracias es de lengua y literatura

Padma has written a paper on the effects of the black death, a plague that struck europe in 1347 and killed millions of people. she focused on three major results of the plague: • a smaller population after the plague led to higher wages and greater independence for workers. • the power of the catholic church weakened because so many members had died and others had lost their faith. • a lack of farm workers led more people to raise livestock rather than planting crops, changing the european diet. read her conclusion: it does not seem right to say that an experience as horrifying as the black death had any “good” sides. still, the changes that followed the plague improved the lives of peasants. people who had previously lived in poverty, forced to work for a single employer, now had higher wages and the freedom to change jobs. even so, the continent had been devastated and would take many years to recover. which statement best evaluates her conclusion? a. the conclusion effectively summarizes all the writer’s main points. b. the conclusion is engaging, but it introduces an unnecessary new idea. c. the conclusion is engaging, but only summarizes one of the writer’s points. d. the conclusion is engaging but it does not summarize any of the writer’s main points.