subject
World Languages, 18.11.2020 19:30 ashleypaz15

What is the difference in arguments presented by the author in Passage 2 and the author in Passage 3? A. In Passage 2, the author believes that U. S. manufacturers no longer rule the world. In Passage 3, the author believes that St. Louis has 34 corporations that have outsourced jobs since 2005. B. In Passage 2, the author believes the progression of technology has caused the United States to lose jobs. In Passage 3, the author believes big business and their political supporters have sparked an outsourcing epidemic. C. In Passage 2, the author believes the focus on jobs and the declining fortunes of particular companies and industries can be deceptive. In Passage 3, the author believes that harnessing the global economy would ensure prosperity at home. D. In Passage 2, the author believes that outsourcing leads to the loss of intellectual assets to overseas operations and the loss of jobs for U. S. workers. In passage 3, the author believes that trade deals passed by the U. S. government have helped to stop job outsourcing.

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on World Languages

question
World Languages, 23.06.2019 02:30
Which of the following statements is true? minerals can be solids or liquids. minerals must have a homogeneous chemical composition. evaporites are a type of metamorphic rock. contact metamorphism is caused by large-scale geological events.
Answers: 1
question
World Languages, 24.06.2019 21:30
What does this tattoo mean in english?
Answers: 1
question
World Languages, 25.06.2019 01:00
Jeremy planned to read the following poem aloud: wisdom by sara teas daleit was a night of early spring, the winter-sleep was scarcely broken; around us shadows and the wind listened for what was never spoken.though half a score of years are gone, spring comes as sharply now as then— but if we had it all to doit would be done the same again. it was a spring that never came; but we have lived enough to know that what we never have, remains; it is the things we have that go. jeremy interpreted this poem to mean that certain people, places, 'and things are important to us in our lives. but as time passes, we lose those things. what technique could jeremy use when reading the poem to emphasize this idea for listeners? a.he could read the poem rapidly to show how quickly people lose what’s important to them. b.he could emphasize the rhyming pattern in each stanza to represent patterns in life. c.he could read the poem slowly to represent the changes that happen over a lifetime. d.he could raise and lower his voice to represent the good and bad things people face in life.
Answers: 1
question
World Languages, 26.06.2019 10:30
Merhaba benim adım bamsu beyruk. what translation.
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
What is the difference in arguments presented by the author in Passage 2 and the author in Passage 3...
Questions
question
Biology, 17.10.2021 14:00
question
Mathematics, 17.10.2021 14:00
question
Mathematics, 17.10.2021 14:00
question
Social Studies, 17.10.2021 14:00
Questions on the website: 13722359