When we talk about the history of science, we usually talk about individuals who contributed to scientific discoveries. Is this a good or bad way of thinking about science? What are some pros or cons?

(drag each tile to the correct identify which questions can be answered by what can be answered by science or which cannot. -is it right or wrong to use genetic engineering to produce new food products? -what are the most common social settings that tend to produce accomplished artists? -if a new gene is added to the genome of a tomato species, will that species be more resistant to insects? -should humans use biotechnology to bring extinct organisms from the fossil record back to life? -do the types of organisms found in the fossil record appear in consistent sequences in different parts of the world? -are michelangelo's paintings more impressive than rembrandt's?

Acceleration is a direct result of a.) balanced forces b.) unbalanced forces c.) gravity d.) velocity hurry!

What best describes the structure of the declaration of independence?