Why do you think it was important for scientists to compare several types of data in order to try to classify Trichoplax? Which type of data do you think is the most
interesting or important to look at for classification?

Read the following scenario to answer the following question. over the past 60 years, many amphibian species have experienced significant population declines, and some species have become extinct. scientists suspected that local human activities such as the destruction of wetlands, regional pollution, and deforestation were the main reasons for these losses. however, research over the past 20 years reveals significant amphibian population declines in protected areas of the world, such as nature preserves and parks. these global declines suggest widespread problems including increased ultraviolet radiation, acid rain, and disease. in switzerland, for example, 14 of the 20 native amphibian species are threatened with extinction. when most populations of a wide-ranging amphibian species are lost and the few remaining populations are widely separated, we expect to see that a. the founder effect becomes increasingly important b. microevolution no longer occurs c. gene flow between populations is reduced d. artificial selection becomes a greater factor in microevolution

Actual age your first developed of age well comparison age refers to absolute age true or false

Which of these is most likely to happen if parallax measurements of star distances are taken after a gap of six months? the results would be accurate the results would be inconsistent the results would not be valid the results would not be repeated