Sunland corporation had the following transactions.

1. sold land (cost $11,400) for $14,400.
2. issued common stock at par for $20,000.
3. recorded depreciation on buildings for $16,400.
4. paid salaries of $8,400.
5. issued 1,300 shares of $1 par value common stock for equipment worth $10,400.
6. sold equipment (cost $9,400, accumulated depreciation $6,580) for $1,128.
(a) for each transaction above, prepare the journal entry.

How should the environmental effects be dealt with when evaluating this project? the environmental effects should be ignored since the plant is legal without mitigation. the environmental effects should be treated as a sunk cost and therefore ignored. if the utility mitigates for the environmental effects, the project is not acceptable. however, before the company chooses to do the project without mitigation, it needs to make sure that any costs of "ill will" for not mitigating for the environmental effects have been considered in the original analysis. the environmental effects should be treated as a remote possibility and should only be considered at the time in which they actually occur. the environmental effects if not mitigated would result in additional cash flows. therefore, since the plant is legal without mitigation, there are no benefits to performing a "no mitigation" analysis.