Business, 20.12.2019 04:31 lololololol16

Quasi contract middleton motors, inc.. a struggling ford dealership in madison, wisconsin. sought managerial andfinancial assistance from lindquist ford, inc. a successful ford dealership in bettendorf, iowa. while the two dealershipsnegotiated the terms for the services and a cash infusion, lindquist sent craig miller, its general manager. to assumecontrol of middleton. after about a year. the parties had not agreed on the terms, lindquist had not invested any money. middleton had not made a profit. and miller was fired without being paid. lindquist and miller ﬁled a suit in a federaldistrict court against middleton based on quasi contract, seeking to recover miller’s pay for his time. what are therequirements to recover on a theory of quasi-contract? which of these requirements is most likely to be disputed in thiscase? why? [lindquist ford, inc. v, middleton motors. inc, 557 f.3d 469 (7th cir. 2009)]

Answers: 1

Show answers

Answers

Answer from: fespinoza019

Quasi Contract:

In the case of Lindquist Ford, Inc. v. Middleton Motors, Inc., 557 F.3d 469 (7th Cir. 2009) the trial court settled money damages to Lindquist. The Court of Appeals reversed the result that the trial court had mismanaged the mutual law theories of quantum meruit and unjust augmentation and imprisoned for a new trial. The trial court settled damages to Lindquist and Miller for Miller's salary.

Explanation:

The necessities to improve on the quasi-contract theory are as follows:

The party looking for damages discussed a benefit on the other party. That party also discussed the benefit with the sensible expectation of being paid. The party was not performing as a volunteer in providing this benefit. The party getting the benefit would be irrationally enriched if permitted to retain the benefit without disbursing for it.

All of these necessities must be encountered in order for a quasi-contract judgment to be awarded.

The necessities under unjust improvement are as follows:

A benefit discussed upon the perpetrator by the plaintiff. Appreciation by the respondent of the fact of such benefit. Acceptance and retention by the respondent of the benefit, under conditions such that it would be discriminatory to retain the advantage without payment of the worth thereof.

Lindquist met the essentials required for unjust enhancement and the court fund in their favor.

The necessities under quantum merit are as follows:

The complainant must prove that the respondent requested the plaintiff's services. It was reasonable for the applicant to expect reimbursement for the services. Lindquist met the elements compulsory for quantum meruit and the court found in their favor.

The condition most likely to be doubtful in this case is whether or not the party seeking compensations actually discussed a benefit upon the other party, or whether Lindquist essentially conferred a benefit upon Middleton through the management of Miller. The court resolute through indication presented that Lindquist and Miller had a reasonable anticipation to payment for services rendered and that Middleton received a benefit from Miller's services

Answer from: Quest

i just took the test and it is financing

Answer from: Quest

hi there,

do u need ? ?

thx

Another question on Business

Business, 21.06.2019 14:10

What sources about ecuador should you consult to obtain cultural information about this country that will need to be included in your cultural map?

Answers: 2

Answer

Business, 22.06.2019 18:20

Now ray has had the tires for two months and he notices that the tread has started to pull away from the tire. he has already contacted the place who sold the tires and calmly and accurately explained the problem. they didn’t him because they no longer carry that tire. so he talked with the manager and he still did not get the tire replaced. his consumer rights are being violated. pretend you are ray and write a letter to the company’s headquarters. here are some points to keep in mind when writing the letter: include your name, address, and account number, if appropriate. describe your purchase (name of product, serial numbers, date and location of purchase). state the problem and give the history of how you tried to resolve the problem. ask for a specific action. include how you can be reached.

Answers: 3

Answer

Business, 22.06.2019 22:10

Scoresby co. uses 6 machine hours and 2 direct labor hours to produce product x. it uses 8 machine hours and 16 direct labor hours to produce product y. scoresby's assembly and finishing departments have factory overhead rates of $240 per machine hour and $160 per direct labor hour, respectively. how much overhead cost will be charged to the two products? a. product x = $1,440; product y = $2,560 b. product x = $1,760; product y = $4,480 c. product x = $3,200; product y = $9,600 d. product x = $800; product y = $800

Answers: 1

Answer

Business, 22.06.2019 23:00

Doogan corporation makes a product with the following standard costs: standard quantity or hours standard price or rate direct materials 2.0 grams $ 7.00 per gram direct labor 1.6 hours $ 12.00 per hour variable overhead 1.6 hours $ 6.00 per hour the company produced 5,000 units in january using 10,340 grams of direct material and 2,320 direct labor-hours. during the month, the company purchased 10,910 grams of the direct material at $7.30 per gram. the actual direct labor rate was $12.85 per hour and the actual variable overhead rate was $5.80 per hour. the company applies variable overhead on the basis of direct labor-hours. the direct materials purchases variance is computed when the materials are purchased. the materials quantity variance for january is:

Answers: 1

Answer

You know the right answer?

Quasi contract middleton motors, inc.. a struggling ford dealership in madison, wisconsin. sought ma...

Questions