Amy owned a condominium directly above Miguel. Amy failed to take proper care of some plumbing problems, and on several occasions, Amy's plumbing leaked into Miguel's apartment and caused property damage. Both Amy and Miguel had signed a condominium association agreement providing that each tenant would pay for any damage caused; that the agreement could be enforced by the management of the association or, in a proper case, by an aggrieved owner; and that adherence to the agreement was required "for the benefit of the Association and any person acquiring or owning an interest in the property." The association itself refused to sue Amy in order to recover damages to reimburse Miguel. Therefore, Miguel sued Amy himself. Amy claimed that Miguel had no standing to sue. Which of the following is the most likely result of the dispute if the court follows Allan v. Nersesova, the case in the text involving a similar issue? A. That the agreement between Amy and the association addressed issues involving intentional wrongdoing, such as out-of-control parties, not issues involving utilities, and that Miguel, therefore, could not sue.
B. That Miguel could proceed but only if he could convince the association to join its lawsuit with his.
C. That Miguel had standing based on the association's failure to act, but that he nevertheless had no right to bring suit because he was not an intended beneficiary of the agreement between Amy and the association.
D. That Miguel was an intended beneficiary of the agreement between Amy and the association, but that he had no right to sue because he nevertheless lacked standing.
E. That Miguel was an intended beneficiary of the agreement between Amy and the association, that he had standing to sue, and that under the terms of the agreement, the association's failure to act gave him the right to proceed.

Which result is a positive aspect of globalization?

Alocal club is selling christmas trees and deciding how many to stock for the month of december. if demand is normally distributed with a mean of 100 and standard deviation of 20, trees have no salvage value at the end of the month, trees cost $20, and trees sell for $50 what is the service level?

1. revising for conciseness - eliminating flabby expressions,limiting long lead-ins, and dropping unnecessary fillerstime is money in any business environment. people want information communicated quickly and clearly. to make your writing more concise and understandable, avoid flabby expressions, long lead-ins, and unnecessary fillers. your audience will appreciate your brevity.1. if your writing contains a flabby expression like in view of the fact that, replace it with the word because / although / probably .for each of the following two sentences, choose the best revision.2. i am sending you this letter to inform you that we have experienced an unexpected surprise within our expense sheet, but we are positively certain we will solve it.1) we need to inform you that we have experienced an unexpected surprise with our expense sheet, but we are midway to an end result.2) we have identified a problem with our expense sheet, but we will solve it.3) i am sending you this letter to inform you that we have a problem with our expense sheet, but we are positively certain we have a solution.3. it is the user who should contact the center.1) everyone knows that it is the user who should contact the center.2) the user should contact the center.3) if there is a problem, the user should contact the center.read the following passage, and then answer the question.[1] you scheduled seven conference calls for this morning between 10 and 11 a.m. [2] generally, the company limits the number of conference calls to three per hour. [3] i’m letting you know that in the future, we should be more careful about scheduling.4. which revision limits the long lead-in in sentence 3? 1) in the future, we should be more careful about scheduling.2) i’m letting you know so that in the future we are more careful about scheduling calls.3) so that you know in the future, we should be more careful about scheduling.