Well, UNIT 11
Looking back
2
Arlen
I always enjoy my trips to Mexico.
A Use anyway three times in this conversation. Leave two of the blanks empty.
Mirka Where were you last week? Were you away?
Arlen Yes, I was in Mexico on busite
Mirka Mexico? What was that like?
Oh, great. The customers there are really nice.,
Mirka Not bad. I had a lot of meetings - you know, the
Arlen Sure. We can meet after work.
anyway, ...
The people are so friendly.
lot these days.
Yeah. About six times a year.
what about you? Did you have a good week?
do you want to go out
tonight? We can have dinner maybe.
I have to go. See you later.
Mirka That's nice.
So you're traveling a
M
Arlen
usual.
Mirka OK. Well,
into colete hacercations

Which of the following statements regarding the learning curve and economies of scale is accurate? answers: just as diseconomies of scale are presumed to exist if a firm gets too large, there is a corresponding increase in costs in the learning-curve model as the cumulative volume of production grows.where diseconomies of scale are presumed to exist if a firm gets too large, there is no corresponding increase in costs in the learning-curve model as the cumulative volume of production grows.where diseconomies of scale are presumed to exist if a firm gets too small, there is no corresponding increase in costs in the learning-curve model as the cumulative volume of production grows.just as diseconomies of scale are presumed to exist if a firm gets too small, there is a corresponding increase in costs in the learning-curve model as the cumulative volume of production grows.

mark, a civil engineer, entered into a contract with david. as per the contract, mark agreed to design and build a house for david for a specified fee. mark provided david with an estimation of the total cost and the contract was mutually agreed upon. however, during construction, when mark increased the price due to a miscalculation on his part, david refused to pay the amount. this scenario is an example of a mistake.

Kendra knight took part in a friendly game of touch football. she had played before and was familiar with football. michael jewett was on her team. in the course of play, michael bumped into kendra and knocked her to the ground. he stepped on her hand, causing injury to a little finger that later required its amputation. she sued michael for damages. he defended on the ground that she had assumed the risk. kendra claimed that assumption of risk could not be raised as a defense because the state legislature had adopted the standard of comparative negligence. what happens if contributory negligence applies? what happens if the defense of comparative negligence applies?