Manley issued a $20,000 negotiable note to Preston to pay for a parcel of land. Preston misrepresented to Manley that the parcel contained 50 acres, when in fact it contained only 40 acres. Preston negotiated the note to Carl. Carl paid Preston $20,000 for the note, and he took it without notice of Preston's fraud. Later, Carl negotiated the note to Ned who knew that Manley claimed that he had been defrauded. a. Is Carl a holder in due course?
b. Manley's defense of fraud is what type of defense?
c. Can Manley assert this defense against Ned?

I’m pretty sure that the answer is d

Amuscle thats keeping you from having  pain.

Via:   "if you are found to be supplying or dealing drugs, the punishment is likely to be tough. supplying drugs doesn’t just apply to dealers. if police suspect that you intend to share drugs with your friends, this is still considered to be supplying.

being suspected of supplying drugs means you are much more likely to be charged. the amount of drugs found on you, and whether you have a criminal record, will be taken into account when a punishment is being decided.

decisions to prosecute are taken by the public prosecution service. the maximum sentences for intent to supply drugs are:

- up to life in prison or an unlimited fine (or both) for a class a drug- up to 14 years in prison or an unlimited fine (or both) for a class b or class c drug."sorry if this was a school question, you didnt supply options so i assumed it was a personal question, which if it is, reconsider selling or having possesion of any drugs at all. i wish you the best!

Ithink the answer is 40%