subject
English, 15.07.2019 23:00 marjae188jackson

You've found an internet article that supports your view of a research subject. the author seems to have excellent credentials, and the article is very well written. however, the author seems to be using outdated information to support her claims, and you can't find other articles that corroborate her information. which of the following statements best describes what your course of action should be and why? a. you should not use the article as a reference. information from the internet isn't trustworthy. b. you should not use the article as a reference. the lack of corroboration and outdated information outweigh the author's credentials. c. you should use the article as a reference. the author is obviously an expert in her field and the information doesn't need to be "nitpicked." d. you should use the article as a reference. the important thing is that you've found a source that will bolster your arguement.

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on English

question
English, 21.06.2019 22:00
Examine the conflict of a popular film. in 7-10 sentences, explain how the writer/director crafts a story around that conflict and why it is engaging for an audience.
Answers: 1
question
English, 22.06.2019 01:00
Whats the best lie you told and got away with?
Answers: 2
question
English, 22.06.2019 08:00
Which statements describe postapocalyptic fiction? check all that apply. it considers humanity and survival. it shows the results of a disastrous event. it focuses on laws and theories of science. it occurs after the end of one world or society. it highlights the role of technology on humanity. it investigates the impact that historical disasters had on people.
Answers: 2
question
English, 22.06.2019 09:00
In a debate focused specifically on the topic of whether new laws are needed to prevent distracted driving, the following argument is made. which type of special appeal does it demonstrate? “my opponent is correct—distracted driving is very dangerous. many activities—texting, talking on the phone, looking at maps, eating breakfast—all of these contribute to accidents. yes, we have statistics to support that. however, my opponent is totally ignoring the role that improper and inconsistent maintenance of your vehicle can also have in causing accidents! ” a. false analogy b. red herring c. bandwagon d. fallacy of argument from ignorance
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
You've found an internet article that supports your view of a research subject. the author seems to...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 20.01.2020 03:31
question
World Languages, 20.01.2020 03:31
question
Mathematics, 20.01.2020 03:31
Questions on the website: 13722360