Which source is the most credible for research about animal rights, specifically the treatment of lab animals? a blog written by an anonymous animal-rights activist the website of a business that uses animals to test their products a segment from a weekly television news show an online article written by an owner of a lab that performs animal testing

Most probably the most credible source of these four options is the segment from the weekly TV show. They are obliged by law to listen to all participants involved, that is activists and lab owners. Also, they information has to come from a reliable source. Although the activist blog could be reliable, the fact that it is anonymous raised suspicions, and the information shared on the blog might not be true or reliable. The other two sources are completely biased.

A segment from a weekly television news show.

Explanation:

This is the most credible source for research about animal rights, specifically the treatment of lab animals. The first option does not describe a professional publication, and has the potential of being biased. The second and fourth option similarly describe situations in which bias is evident. Only the third option describes a source that is likely to be neutral.

1. read the following excerpt from franklin d. roosevelt's "fireside chat 19":

on the other side of the picture, we must learn also to know that guerilla warfare against the germans in, let us say serbia or norway, us; that a successful russian offensive against the germans us; and that british successes on land or sea in any part of the world strengthen our hands.

remember always that germany and italy, regardless of any formal declaration of war, consider themselves at war with the united states at this moment just as much as they consider themselves at war with britain or russia. and germany puts all the other republics of the americas into the same category of enemies. the people of our sister republics of this hemisphere can be honored by that fact.  

the true goal we seek is far above and beyond the ugly field of battle. when we resort to force, as now we must, we are determined that this force shall be directed toward ultimate good as well as against immediate evil. we americans are not destroyers — we are builders.

analyze the effectiveness of this excerpt. how does it function within the speech as a whole? how does the structure of the excerpt to convey the speech's purpose and key points? support your argument with evidence from the speech. (10 points)

i will have to go with 1.

hope this !