Read the quotation. let me walk three weeks in the footsteps of my enemy, carry the same burden, have the same trials as he, before i say one word to criticize. which statement best restates the main idea of this quotation? do not criticize an enemy after pretending to be him or her for three weeks. it’s not good to criticize others because we don’t know what they face in life. it’s acceptable to criticize an enemy because he or she is not a good person. criticizing another person is all right after a certain amount of time has passed.

The answer is It’s not good to criticize others because we don’t know what they face in life. The idea is first to try to understand what the motivations are before we engage in criticism.

The first option mentions the limit of three weeks, in the quotation three weeks can be understood as a period to have an idea of the other's motivations, it is not a number to be interpreted literally.

Surely the quotation is against the idea that the enemy is not a good person, on the contrary, the quotation urges people to try to check what is behind the deemed enemy.

it does not follow logically that it is all right to criticize another person after we get to know them, we can have a better idea of their motivation and maybe raise some criticism.

"It’s not good to criticize others because we don’t know what they face in life." This is the best statement that restates the main idea of the quotation. The speaker says that he should be in the enemy's place- let me walk in the footsteps - and live the enemy's life feeling some of his problems - same problems ...same trials - before he can give any opinion about him /her- ..before I say one- .

-Do not criticize an enemy after pretending to be him or her for three weeks.  The speaker does not pretend to be his enemy but to sympathize with him.

-It’s acceptable to criticize an enemy because he or she is not a good person. The speaker does not judge his enemy. He says the other person should be comprehended.

-Criticizing another person is all right after a certain amount of time has passed. The speaker is against criticizing a person. A person should be comprehended.

1. read the following excerpt from franklin d. roosevelt's "fireside chat 19":

on the other side of the picture, we must learn also to know that guerilla warfare against the germans in, let us say serbia or norway, us; that a successful russian offensive against the germans us; and that british successes on land or sea in any part of the world strengthen our hands.

remember always that germany and italy, regardless of any formal declaration of war, consider themselves at war with the united states at this moment just as much as they consider themselves at war with britain or russia. and germany puts all the other republics of the americas into the same category of enemies. the people of our sister republics of this hemisphere can be honored by that fact.  

the true goal we seek is far above and beyond the ugly field of battle. when we resort to force, as now we must, we are determined that this force shall be directed toward ultimate good as well as against immediate evil. we americans are not destroyers — we are builders.

analyze the effectiveness of this excerpt. how does it function within the speech as a whole? how does the structure of the excerpt to convey the speech's purpose and key points? support your argument with evidence from the speech. (10 points)

u could type them in google docs or look up flash card so that way u won have to do all that