Read the excerpt from julius caesar, act 2, scene 1. decius. shall no man else be touched, but only caesar? cassius. decius, well urged. i think it is not meet mark antony, so well beloved of caesar, should outlive caesar. we shall find of him a shrewd contriver. and you know his means,35 if he improve them, may well stretch so far as to annoy us all; which to prevent, let antony and caesar fall together. brutus. our course will seem too bloody, caius cassius, to cut the head off and then hack the limbs,40 like wrath in death and envy afterwards— for antony is but a limb of caesar. let us be sacrificers, but not butchers, caius. we all stand up against the spirit of caesar, and in the spirit of men there is no blood.45 o, that we then could come by caesar’s spirit, and not dismember caesar! but, alas, caesar must bleed for it. and, gentle friends, let’s kill him boldly, but not wrathfully. let’s carve him as a dish fit for the gods,50 not hew him as a carcass fit for hounds. and let our hearts, as subtle masters do, stir up their servants to an act of rage, and after seem to chide 'em. this shall make our purpose necessary, and not envious,55 which so appearing to the common eyes, we shall be called purgers, not murderers. and for mark antony, think not of him, for he can do no more than caesar’s arm when caesar’s head is off.60 which conclusion does this excerpt best support?
a)mark antony’s life will be spared because he will be useless without caesar. b)mark antony should also be assassinated because he and caesar are so close. c)all of caesar’s followers should be put to death, not just mark antony.
d)no matter whom brutus and the others kill, they must do so without anger.

b)metaphor

explanation:

when reading the sentence carefully it says,"hope is a thing with feathers" it's like saying: hope is a thing like feathers

get what i'm saying? instead of using a smilie like or as they use "with"

it would be nice enough if i got .

summer because you get to tan and wear cooler clothes and go to the beach

explanation:

the intellectual community is a place like a university where people with high marks, or original thought or an outstanding interest in something gather. they take classes together. they discuss things. they argue sometimes, and not always in a friendly way. but if they argue, it is because they are passionate about something, and there is nothing the matter with that.

lately i've been hearing rumors that it is not the way it was when i went to school. the one thing all schools used to have was free speech. the 1st amendment rights were sacred. now i'm hearing they are not. students can be reported and disciplined for giving an off the wall opinion.

that is shameful.

intellectual ideas are meant to be discussed. they are meant to be chewed up and worked on. that is the primary responsibility of every intellectual community. if that is not the way it is, then that is not a school to go to.

social media, in my opinion, and this is just an opinion. i wouldn't take it too seriously, complicates everything to do with human communication. you can want to share things and others feel they have the right to be very critical or sarcastic or mean about what you share. lack of respect is an immeasurable intolerable condition and social media abounds with that sort of thing.

one of the things i really like about is how careful people are because they must have some idea that the mods are exactly what the word says they are. they police this board very well, and what is so remarkable about them is that they are no older than the average grade 12 student.

my hat goes off to them (which means i respect them quite a bit).

im not 100 percent sure but i think its a