Refer to your expeditions in reading book for a complete version of this text.

part a

how does the author of “solar power for public buildings” conclude that converting all public buildings to solar power is a healthy choice for californians?

the author cites a study that confirms that most people prefer solar power over other sources.

the author explains how replacing fossil fuels with solar power will improve the environment.

the author suggests that converting to solar power will attract more businesses to the state.

the author emphasizes that the state has always been a leader in progress and imagination.
question 2
part b

which evidence from the text best supports the answer to part a?

“solar panels do not give off harmful gases. they do not produce toxic chemicals. so pollution levels will drop ('benefits of renewable energy use'). big cities will have less smog. there will be fewer health problems from breathing dirty air. rivers and streams will also be less contaminated. drinking water will be cleaner.”

“lastly, the general public supports solar power. harvard university professor stephen ansolabehere did a study on public attitudes toward renewable energy. the study lasted 12 years. it was very thorough. in the end, he described solar power as ‘hugely popular, overwhelmingly popular.’”

“he recently described how ‘a little corner of nevada or utah’ could soon ‘power the entire united states’ (harrington). perhaps musk and other business owners will take notice when california’s public buildings use solar energy. perhaps they will be inspired. perhaps they will start to use solar power for their companies’ electric needs, too.”

“california is a hub of creativity. it is a cradle of innovation. the state is home to the fantastic films of hollywood. it is home to the cutting-edge companies of silicon valley.”