PETROCELLI
Well, if you don’t know exactly where you were, can you tell me anyone who might know where you were?

STEVE
I don’t even remember where I was. When the detectives asked me where I was, I couldn’t even remember the day they were talking about. They didn’t ask me about it until weeks later.

What would the judge and jury most likely think after hearing this dialogue?

Steve may be dishonest because he is accusing the detectives of working slowly.
Steve may be honest because people could easily forget where they were weeks earlier.
Steve may be deceitful because he seems to be avoiding Petrocelli's questioning.
Steve may be trustworthy because he is repeating the same thing that he told the detectives earlier.

faulty parallelism is a construction in which two or more parts of a sentence are equivalent in meaning but not grammatically similar in form.

the correct version of this faulty parallelism in the sentence is:

the hikers knew that the hike was six miles, that it usually required the entire day, and it would not be wise to start after 10: 00 a.m.

the problem is the last sentence, the first two have a basic subject+verb+object structure.

so, to give a proper balance to the structure, or better said, to give a parallel structure, we must write a basic s+v+o structure in all three sentences:

the hikers knew that the hike was six miles, that it usually required the entire day, and it would not be wise to start after 10: 00 a.m.

i think the answer will be theseeeennutttsssss

the answer is c. the wind

ed brushes his teeth

explanation: