4. PART A: How do Eckels' actions while he is in the past
develop the plot of the passage?
e? For want of
s, vultures,
to this: Fifty-
or saber-
ng on one
ble 6 man,
one hundred
e, an entire
pot, on one
own through
born are
er a dark forest,
Step on a mouse
r be born,
pe careful. Stay on
O A Eckels disobeys Travis'instructions and steps off the
Path, resulting in Travis' decision to leave him in the
past.
OB Eckels puts the safety of himself above his fellow
hunters when he steps off the Path, making them more
willing to dispose of him.
C Eckels carelessly steps off the Path out of fear, and
disrupts the past in a way that will likely impact the
future.
D Eckels breaks the laws of time travel by stepping off the
Path, so in the future only non-hunters will be allowed
to time travel.

Read the excerpt. while i am i, and you are you, so long as the world contains us both, me the loving and you the loth, while the one eludes, must the other pursue. what do these lines, from “life in a love” by robert browning, convey about the speaker’s pursuit of his beloved? eventually, they will switch roles, and she will chase him. he will try to win her love for as long as they are both alive. if they lived in a different time and place, he would not love her. they are meant for each other, and he is certain that they will be together.

Me for the love of god. i've been working on this assignment for 3 days and i don't understand the speeches at all ive read both 4 times over and i don't understand either of them if your right i will give you brainlest (i think that's how you spell it) and 99 pts. for this assignment, you will write an evaluation of either of two historic passages. • patrick henry’s “give me liberty, or give me death! ” speech (1775) • frederick douglass’s address, “what to the slave is the fourth of july? ” (1852) 1. what is the speaker’s viewpoint? what is his claim? type your answer here. (score for question 2: of 2 points) 2. what reasons does the speaker provide to support his viewpoint or claim? type your answer here. (score for question 3: of 4 points) 3. how valid are the speaker’s reasons for his claim? use evidence from the text to support your answer. type your answer here. (score for question 4: of 2 points) 4. what evidence does the speaker provide to support his reasons? type your answer here. (score for question 5: of 4 points) 5. is the speaker’s evidence relevant and sufficient? use evidence from the text to support your answer. type your answer here. (score for question 6: of 4 points) 6. does the speaker use fallacious reasoning or logical fallacies? use evidence from the text to support your answers. type your answer here. (score for question 7: of 4 points) 7. what counterclaims or alternate claims does the speaker address, and how does he respond to them? type your answer here. (score for question 8: of 4 points) 8. how effective is the speaker’s response to counterclaims or alternate claims? use evidence from the text to support your answer. type your answer here. (score for question 9: of 4 points) 9. write a one-paragraph evaluation of the speaker’s argument. type your answer here.

Ok which of peter's lines shows that he is using personal experience to understand the reading?