English, 30.10.2020 21:50 brandonkelly104

It is true that the material which has gone into it has been paid for, the labor which has been spent upon it has received its hire. But the money which did these things was not the money
of those who own the Bridge. The money was lent to them on the faith that these two great
cities would redeem their bond. So have the Alps been tunneled in our day; while the ancient
prophecy has been fulfilled that faith should remove mountains. We justify this faith in us as
we pay for the Bridge by redeeming the bond (Paragraph 3)
How does this excerpt support Low's defense of how the bridge project was managed?
1. A. by arguing that the Brooklyn Bridge will pay for itself many times over as the years
progress
2. B. by noting that the Brooklyn Bridge is the first and greatest achievement in manmade
construction
3. C. by suggesting that the people of Brooklyn and Manhattan should be rewarded for
supporting the project
4. D. by explaining that the advantages it affords Brooklyn and Manhattan justify the
expense of the bridge

explain why your answer is right

Answers: 1

Show answers

Another question on English

English, 21.06.2019 18:00

Context clues can be definitions, examples, synonyms, or antonyms. the word root can give you an idea of the word’s meaning. affixes can you determine the word’s form and meaning. use the drop-down menus to identify the root in each difficult word. automatic: gratify: untenable:

Answers: 1

Answer

English, 21.06.2019 20:20

Which passage is the best example of deductive reasoning? a. aaron wants to try something new for lunch. he asks his coworkers what they like and then decides where to eat b. everyone in mr. kim’s class got an a on the test. casey is in mr. kim’s class, so he must have received an a on the test. c. petra sees that all the kids at her school walk home. tomorrow she will tell her mother she doesn’t need a ride home. d. saul is buying a present for his sister. he asks his mother for suggestions and then goes to the mall to find something.

Answers: 2

Answer

English, 21.06.2019 21:00

What argument does thomas jefferson make in this excerpt from the declaration of independence? we hold these truths to be self-evident that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.-that to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, -that whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness. a. b. c. the american colonists desire a more peaceful alliance with great britain but their british counterparts do not. the american colonists have a right to seek freedom from great britain due to the continued oppression of their basic rights. the american colonies could form a better government than the one established by great britain to govern them. the king of britain and the members of british parliament have little interest in the welfare of the colonies. od. e. the american colonies should have sufficient representation in british parliament if america and great britain are to coexist peacefully.

Answers: 1

Answer

English, 22.06.2019 14:00

Read the passage from the opinion of the court in dred scott v. sandford, written by justice taney. the question then arises, whether the provisions of the constitution, in relation to the personal rights and privileges to which the citizen of a state should be entitled, embraced the negro african race, at that time in this country, or who might afterwards be imported, who had then or should afterwards be made free in any state; and to put it in the power of a single state to make him a citizen of the united states, and endue him with the full rights of citizenship in every other state without their consent? does the constitution of the united states act upon him whenever he shall be made free under the laws of a state, and raised there to the rank of a citizen, and immediately clothe him with all the privileges of a citizen in every other state, and in its own courts? the court thinks the affirmative of these propositions cannot be maintained. and if it cannot, the plaintiff in error could not be a citizen of the state of missouri, within the meaning of the constitution of the united states, and, consequently, was not entitled to sue in its courts. what claim does justice taney make in this passage? that sanford has the right to enslave scott that scott has the right to be emancipated that scott is not a citizen of missouri that sanford cannot sue because he is not a citizen

Answers: 1

Answer

You know the right answer?

It is true that the material which has gone into it has been paid for, the labor which has been spe...

Questions