In the last paragraph of Passage 2, on page 6, how does the author imply what he does not say
directly?
Through satire, he shows how much he admires the
actions of Launcelot and Guenever.
Through irony, he shows that the queen appears
happy, but that the reverse is actually true.
Through sarcasm, he shows the flirtation between
Launcelot and Guenever.
Through overstatement, he comments on the
extreme wrongness of the flirtation.

Through Overstatement, he comments on the extreme wrongness of the flirtation.

Explanation:

He uses language that is descriptive and as said overstates to exaggerate the wrongness of the flirtation.

"fling furtive glances at Sir Launcelot that would have got him shot in Arkansas."

This quote is a great example in showing the author's view on how wrong this is, of course without reading the passage it could be easily mistaken as sarcasm, but if you read the passage you will see it leaves no other trace of sarcasm that could be used to define it.

But the Author does use sentences such as "...it was touching to see the queen blush and smile, and look embarrassed and happy,..." to bring forth the overstatement and importance of this.

i guess you are missing the idea that has to be supported, am i right?

fire

explanation: