In which type of fallacy does the conclusion not come from concrete evidence? Ad hominem
Non-sequitor
The straw man
Erroneous cause

Ad hominem

Explanation:

 The ad hominem fallacy doesn't come from any concrete evidence, because, as stated in your lesson, it's literally an "argument against a person." It doesn't consider any facts on the real matter at hand, instead, it assumes the matter is bad just because a certain person is involved.

If you have any questions feel free to message me, I hope this helped!

the answer is

r ≈5.641

plug in the area of 100 yards into the equation

100=

divide each side by pi

≈ 31.8309=

take the square root of each side to find r

=r

r ≈5.641

jeez la wheeze! i just checked other people who had the same question as you and both had terrible answers.

i hope i could be a little bit of a though!

hmm, lets see here. okay! so, i don't know the passages exactly since i haven't taken that quiz before, but! i will try to the best i can.

if you need on what igbo means, ill give you a hand.

igbo means a member of a people of southeastern nigeria.

so, they're asking you, "what passage uses igbo words or phrases and in at least 100 words, identify the kinds of context clues the author uses to hint at the words' meaning."

so basically, don't stress or over look this.

look closely at the passages and see if you can spot any of those hints! it doesn't have to be all, remember, its a quiz! no right or wrong answers.

the teachers are always there to and if you are struggling on this topic they will notice it in your score on the quiz and you.

(; i do hope this is useful to you!     < 3