How could the writer improve the underlined sentence to remove the logical fallacy? A.
Everyone who appreciates our country’s oldest buildings should forget the architectural philosophy “out with the old, in with the new.”
B.
Anyone who accepts the “out with the old, in with the new” architectural philosophy is a menace to society.
C.
Some people have embraced the “out with the old, in with the new” philosophy, as the number of applications for demolition permits hit a record high this year.
D.
The “out with the old, in with the new” approach to architecture is clearly a result of people who no longer care about our country’s oldest buildings.

sensory details?

so i`m assuming you are writing something from a bats (the animal) point of view. if this is the case, you can use sights, sounds, feelings, and tastes.

and idk what you mean by domain, but all of the sensory details will depend on where the bat is.

a bat doesn't see color very well, so its surroundings will be dulled.

it can hear super well. so maybe it can hear the insects on the ground

feelings. you can imagine how a bat would feel from its perspective. it all depends on where it lives.

maybe it can taste the salt in the air, or smell water, or something. all of these details are completely dependent on where it is located.

hope this .

so you want me to do this crossword i’m good with crossword puzzles just don’t got the time yo, maybe later this week