Read the excerpt from a student’s essay. rainsford believes that people’s abilities to use reason in times of stress are what separates them from animals. he also believes that this is what elevates people above animals. this is what allows people to be hunters, while animals are there to be hunted. rainsford’s view of the world is, therefore, very simple and specific. there are two classes of beings, and rainsford, because of his ability to reason, is in the hunting class. which transition best fills in the blank?

Read the excerpt from "politics and the english language" by george orwell. by this morning’s post i have received a pamphlet dealing with conditions in germany. the author tells me that he "felt impelled” to write it. i open it at random, and here is almost the first sentence that i see: "[the allies] have an opportunity not only of achieving a radical transformation of germany’s social and political structure in such a way as to avoid a nationalistic reaction in germany itself, but at the same time of laying the foundations of a cooperative and unified europe.” which statement is correct? orwell uses an example and statistical evidence in this excerpt. orwell uses an example and a quotation for evidence in this excerpt. orwell uses hypothetical and factual evidence in this excerpt. orwell uses hypothetical and statistical evidence in this excerpt.