06.07 Build a Convincing Argument Uung the ideas you previously wrote in you. Argument Organizer and introduction, you will wote the body paragraphs of your argument Important note: You will submit your introduction and body for this assignment View the grade rubric as you complete your work. This is your guide to a super submission L. You have previously written the introduction to your argument. Now you will win the body paragraphs to continue your argument 2.Be sure to use the information you previously wrote in your Argumentanen 3. In three body paragraphs, remember to include • BODY PARAGRAPH Na strong reason for your daim and researched facto support your claim • BODY PARAGRAPH 2 another strong reason for your daim and researched to support your claim BODY PARAGRAPH a counter aim against your argument, archutal and researched fact to support your rebuttal 4 Write in formal style the third person point of view 6 Add your introduction to the body Submit your work in 06 07 Build a convincing Argument why shouldn't teens be able to play dangerous sports ​

Read the passage from the opinion of the court in dred scott v. sandford, written by justice taney. the question then arises, whether the provisions of the constitution, in relation to the personal rights and privileges to which the citizen of a state should be entitled, embraced the negro african race, at that time in this country, or who might afterwards be imported, who had then or should afterwards be made free in any state; and to put it in the power of a single state to make him a citizen of the united states, and endue him with the full rights of citizenship in every other state without their consent? does the constitution of the united states act upon him whenever he shall be made free under the laws of a state, and raised there to the rank of a citizen, and immediately clothe him with all the privileges of a citizen in every other state, and in its own courts? the court thinks the affirmative of these propositions cannot be maintained. and if it cannot, the plaintiff in error could not be a citizen of the state of missouri, within the meaning of the constitution of the united states, and, consequently, was not entitled to sue in its courts. what claim does justice taney make in this passage? that sanford has the right to enslave scott that scott has the right to be emancipated that scott is not a citizen of missouri that sanford cannot sue because he is not a citizen