Does the author succeed in supporting the claim that "In no other department is a thorough knowledge of history so important as in philosophy"?
1. Yes, because he gives examples of why knowledge of history is vital to philosophy.
2. Yes, because he proves that other departments of thought are not reliant on historical knowledge.
3. No, because he proceeds to explain why knowledge of history is as important to other disciplines.
O 4. No, because he digresses into another topic and does not address historicallynowledge.

what part do you need with?

substitute y = 2x - 4 to x + 2y = 12:

x + 2(2x - 4) = 12     use distributive property

x + (2)(2x) + () = 12

x + 4x - 8 = 12     add 8 to both sides

5x = 20     divide both sides by 5

x = 4

put the value of x to the first equation:

y = 2(4) - 4

y = 8 - 4

y = 4

answer is: d.because he was such a marginal player but was on several super bowl-winning teams, it's possible that harper let success go to his head.

hope this

well easy, ask her if she's free or if she would like to go out with you.

explanation: