Writing about winning isn't everything
more than 15 line

See below.

Explanation:

Winning isn’t everything; it’s the only thing,” this statement is incorrect. “It doesn't matter if you win or lose, its how you play the game," is the motto athletes should live by. I personally think winning isn’t everything because without sportsmanship, having a great time, and trying your hardest you wouldn’t be winning. Saying, “winning isn’t everything; it’s the only thing,” is like saying LeBron James is the only valuable player on the LA Lakers; there are better things that winning. Personally, I think sports teams need to experience losing because then they can know what mistake they committed.

To begin with, winning sometimes causes bragging and that annoys many people. Winning isn’t everything because every sports team needs to lose. You can’t win if you don’t lose because everyone needs to know what error they committed. “Winning isn’t everything; it’s the only thing,” is like saying it’s your main priority and you don’t care about anything else unless you fulfill it. Constantly bragging about winning isn’t immense, it’s the most aggravating thing ever.

Nevertheless, winning causes arrogance. Some sports teams think that just because they won, they are much better than the others. It gives them an arrogant attitude that drives people to the edge. Imagine this: the Lakers NBA basketball team win, they are going to feel higher than the ones they went against. Therefore, some teams get arrogant and it frustrates the other teams.

Finally, winning causes reassurance. Some teams think that just because they have won against their opponent, they are going to be undefeatable. Reassurance is what they feel in their blood, their brains thinking they are never going to lose. After losing, they will understand winning isn't everything, it's about how you react after a loss.

Its assertion regarding the significance of winning has been hailed as the cornerstone of American sports philosophy while also being criticized as encapsulating everything that is apparently wrong with competitive sports. The ideology serves as a counterweight to sportswriter Grantland Rice's well-known notion that "it's not whether you won or lost, but how you played the game," and to Pierre de Coubertin's S primo prime modern Olympic philosophy. The most essential thing is to take action, not to succeed." Winning is an important notion in athletics, but it is also one of the most misunderstood concepts. Winning is a concept that has been for generations, but it is much more than that. It is about respect and knowing that you are capable of achieving your goal. In conclusion, winning isn't everything; it is simply the reward for your hard effort.

this long enough?

1. read the following excerpt from franklin d. roosevelt's "fireside chat 19":

on the other side of the picture, we must learn also to know that guerilla warfare against the germans in, let us say serbia or norway, us; that a successful russian offensive against the germans us; and that british successes on land or sea in any part of the world strengthen our hands.

remember always that germany and italy, regardless of any formal declaration of war, consider themselves at war with the united states at this moment just as much as they consider themselves at war with britain or russia. and germany puts all the other republics of the americas into the same category of enemies. the people of our sister republics of this hemisphere can be honored by that fact.  

the true goal we seek is far above and beyond the ugly field of battle. when we resort to force, as now we must, we are determined that this force shall be directed toward ultimate good as well as against immediate evil. we americans are not destroyers — we are builders.

analyze the effectiveness of this excerpt. how does it function within the speech as a whole? how does the structure of the excerpt to convey the speech's purpose and key points? support your argument with evidence from the speech. (10 points)

based on the biblical principle proverbs 16: 32, i agree with the author of the passage "better is it that it takes longer to be angry than the strong " to the extent that i share the philosophy that the nobility of heart demonstrates the strength of a person. those who are very proud, get angry easily and show their anger toward others are really weak, but those who are noble and do not constantly obfuscate or contain their feelings of anger, are strong people