subject
English, 16.07.2019 11:00 bookprincesslol

Read the excerpt from “harriet tubman: a life of toil and triumph.” after harriet journeyed to the safety of philadelphia, she met with members of the anti-slavery society. she wanted to learn more about the special railroad that had her become free, and then she wanted to . without taking any time to enjoy her newfound freedom, she signed on as a conductor. soon she was headed back to maryland to guide others safely north. then in 1850, the united states passed the fugitive slave act. this forced citizens of the northern states to return escaped enslaved persons to the south. remarkably, harriet did not become discouraged. instead, she conducted her passengers all the way to canada—a trip of an extra three hundred miles! in all, she made that trip nineteen times, freeing her family and three hundred additional enslaved persons in the process. what inference can be made about harriet tubman’s character? a she was tireless in bringing others to freedom. b she felt entitled to freedom and an easy life. c she was too busy to enjoy her new freedom. d she worked as a conductor to free her family.

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on English

question
English, 21.06.2019 16:00
Which of the following quotations reveal an omniscient point-of-view? a. "then the king got his spear in both his hands and ran toward sir mordred, crying, 'traitor, now has thy death-day come! '" b. "and the king thought that under him, far from him, was hideous deep black water; therein were all manner of serpents and worms and wild beasts, foul and horrible." c. "but when the hosts on both sides saw that sword drawn, they blew trumpets and horns and shouted grimly, and the two hosts rushed toward each other." d."then they agreed that king arthur and sir mordred should meet between their two hosts, and that each of them should bring fourteen persons with him."
Answers: 1
question
English, 22.06.2019 07:30
Does wealth play a part in politics? why or why not?
Answers: 1
question
English, 22.06.2019 09:00
In a debate focused specifically on the topic of whether new laws are needed to prevent distracted driving, the following argument is made. which type of special appeal does it demonstrate? “my opponent is correct—distracted driving is very dangerous. many activities—texting, talking on the phone, looking at maps, eating breakfast—all of these contribute to accidents. yes, we have statistics to support that. however, my opponent is totally ignoring the role that improper and inconsistent maintenance of your vehicle can also have in causing accidents! ” a. false analogy b. red herring c. bandwagon d. fallacy of argument from ignorance
Answers: 2
question
English, 22.06.2019 10:30
Which statement best summarizes the authors point of view on sopa?
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Read the excerpt from “harriet tubman: a life of toil and triumph.” after harriet journeyed to the...
Questions
question
Biology, 08.06.2021 15:40
question
Biology, 08.06.2021 15:40
question
Mathematics, 08.06.2021 15:40
question
Mathematics, 08.06.2021 15:40
question
Mathematics, 08.06.2021 15:40
question
Mathematics, 08.06.2021 15:40
question
History, 08.06.2021 15:40
question
Mathematics, 08.06.2021 15:40
Questions on the website: 13722359