Question b
some might say that the roman civilization was an imitation of the greek’s accomplishments. do you agree or disagree with that statement? provide an example to support your position.

Answer and Explanation:

Imitating isn't proper term to use here, I think affected would be a superior wording since Roman development was to a great extent impacted by Greek human progress. We can demonstrate it by observing the similarity between both the human advancements. both developed wine and olives inspite of contrasts in territory and geography.

The specialty of both the developments additionally has loads of likenesses. However, it is additionally certain that not both expressions of the human experience are absolutely same and in this manner we ought not call it as impersonation. The reality of the situation may prove that Roman progress built up their craft with impact of Greeks however with specific alterations.

In this manner, it is certain that Roman development was impacted by the Greek progress yet it was anything but an ideal impersonation and rather an alteration in Greek human progress.

this is a dumb website you do not know anything fool

explanation: