What was an effect of the writings of ida b. wells about attacks on african americans?

As an effect of her writings about attacks on African Americans, Ida B. Wells had to leave Memphis, as many white people threatened her.

Explanation:

Ida B. Wells was an African-American woman co-founder of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People and dedicated to the defense of civil rights and the rights of women in the United States.

In 1889 she began to co-own and write a newspaper against segregation that was published in Memphis, whose name was Free Speech. In 1892 she was forced to leave the city because of the publication of an article written by her denouncing the lynching of three friends who owned a grocery store accused of taking away customers from their white competitors. Many African-Americans decided to leave the city while others organized boycotts for businesses whose owners were white, as a result Wells moved her residence to Chicago.

In 1892 she published a famous pamphlet entitled: "Southern Horrors: Lynch Law in All Its Phases", which together with another entitled "A Red Record" were the beginning of her documented research and campaign against lynchings. Having contrasted different cases of lynching due to accusations against black men of raping white women, she concluded that in the southern United States the excuse of alleged abuse was used to hide the real motive of lynching African American men: the economic progress of black people, which not only threatened their money but also the idea of the innate inferiority of the black man.

explanation:

there are two statements that are incorrect.

1. the marshall plan was a lend lease program. it was an economic plan that europe redevelop itself after wwii.

2. einstein didn't really do anything to further the allied cause in building the bomb. he merely sent a letter to fdr telling him (in 1939) that if the united states entered the war, perhaps it would be wise to build the bomb before germany did. i would say this answer is incorrect, but when america entered the war 2 years later, fdr thought it might be a good idea to take einstein's advice.

the 4th choice is definitely so wrong that is likely the single answer of this question

yes

explanation:

the fighting words doctrine, in united states constitutional law, is a limitation to freedom of speech as protected by the first amendment to the united states constitution. in 1942, the u.s. supreme court established the doctrine by a 9–0 decision in chaplinsky v. new hampshire.