Consider the pepfar funding chart provided above. how might these efforts be beneficial to the united states?

The correct answer is A) Providing aid open diplomatic doors for peaceful interventions while addressing global health challenges.

The efforts can be beneficial for the United States in that providing aid open diplomatic doors for peaceful interventions while addressing global health challenges.

The table attached shows the king of funding for activities related to blood safety considered by the government of the United States PEPFAR (President's Emergency Plan for Aids Relief.) The funding of PEPFAR goes to support plans and programs in other nations. As the table shows, countries benefited with the aid can be found in the Caribbean such as Haiti and Guyana, or it could be countries in Africa such as Kenya, Namibia, Nigeria, Ethiopia, Rwanda, Zambia, and Tanzania.

The other options of the question were b) assisting countries that struggle against the spread of AIDS will not impact  U.S. influence on developing nations, c) assisting developing nations may lead to totalitarianism in weakened countries, and d) addressing worldwide health issues may benefit only those nations receiving the funds.

woodrow wilsons and the treaty signed between france britain and italy

nope.

explanation: