How were the political structures of the jamestown and plymouth colonies different? a. the plymouth colony was organized around its charter, which gave colonists the same rights as other englishmen. b. the jamestown colonists were largely separate from english rule once it was clear they were not going to find gold. c. the jamestown charter provided the colony with the basis for a system of consensual self-government. d. the plymouth colonists did not settle in the area specified in their charter, so they wrote their own governing rules

D. The Plymouth colonists did not settle in the area specified in their charter, so they wrote their own governing rules

Option D.

Explanation:

The colonists of  Plymouth did not reside in the territory defined in their charter, so they drafted their own regulatory rules, is the right answer.

Though both the settlements were founded in the relative time, the two colonies differed from each other in various aspects such as socially, politically and economically. for instance, the colonists of  Plymouth did not reside in the territory defined in their charter, so they drafted their own regulatory rules.

relations between the soviet union and the united states were driven by a complex interplay of ideological, political, and economic factors, which led to shifts between cautious cooperation and often bitter superpower rivalry over the years. the distinct differences in the political systems of the two countries often prevented them from reaching a mutual understanding on key policy issues and even, as in the case of the cuban missile crisis, brought them to the brink of war.

the united states government was initially hostile to the soviet leaders for taking russia out of world war i and was opposed to a state ideologically based on communism. although the united states embarked on a famine relief program in the soviet union in the early 1920s and american businessmen established commercial ties there during the period of the new economic policy (1921–29), the two countries did not establish diplomatic relations until 1933. by that time, the totalitarian nature of joseph stalin's regime presented an insurmountable obstacle to friendly relations with the west. although world war ii brought the two countries into alliance, based on the common aim of defeating nazi germany, the soviet union's aggressive, antidemocratic policy toward eastern europe had created tensions even before the war ended.

i think it would be reparing roads