Do you support or oppose the following statement? the use of the atomic bomb against japanese civilians and military personnel was a morally acceptable method to end world war ii.

The consensus regarding the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagaski as a means of ending WWII is mixed. Some commentators argue that the cost in American lives of a ground invasion of Japan would be too great. Others have argued that the bombing of two Japanese cities was inhumane. The death toll and the nuclear fallout from the bombs had innumerable effects on the population for generations. It also distinguishes the United States from other countries in the world. The U.S. is the only country to have utilized nuclear weapons in an armed conflict.

i told you before its c

when a country suffers, for example, a drought period, the market product is affected for a low offer, in this case, potatoes; the government has to tax to the households, which have to give more money for the potatoes which they consume, that situation make them consume substitute goods even through loans, it could increase the financial market movement and the inflationary phenomena, the business has to increase salaries in order to the employees could buy a more expensive food (potatoes) and in order to inflation tha business had to buy expensive supplies in the factor market, while the rest of the world have to gain more money to consume the same amount of potatoes.