subject
History, 14.01.2020 06:31 Leeyah6606

“the killing of up to 1.5 million people in the armenian genocide was mostly the result of turkish nationalism, and it had little to do with the first world war.”
you are developing in this post an argument for or against the boldfaced statement above.

questions to consider:
do you agree or disagree with this statement?
why or why not? what evidence can you provide to support your view?
what evidence can you find that might support the opposing argument?

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on History

question
History, 21.06.2019 15:30
The leader of the majority part in the house of commons is usually britain’s
Answers: 1
question
History, 21.06.2019 22:10
Imagine that you are putting together a time capsule for future generations. it will be buried and then unearthed in the year 3000. you want to place in it the items you feel best document your life and times. they can be personal items or items that relate to your larger community. name six items you would include. they can be objects, writing, or something in an audio or visual format. what would you include and why? describe each item in one or two sentences mentioning what it is and how it could future generations learn about your life and times.
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 01:00
What was the focus of the stanford study-pls
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 02:00
Which of these were effects of mass production techniques used during 1920s
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
“the killing of up to 1.5 million people in the armenian genocide was mostly the result of turkish n...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 04.01.2021 22:30
question
Mathematics, 04.01.2021 22:30
Questions on the website: 13722359