Should roosevelt be given the task of “ improving” parts of the world even if they do not want to be improved?

No

Explanation:

First of all, who would be the one giving the task?

Second of all, the people must be able to accept change for them to experience change.

Third of all, who would take on the task? Which country/people? Who would provide the resources, fundings, & volunteers to help "improve" the world.

Fourth, what kind of improvements are we talking about? Is it really beneficial, or does it just help with foreign government agendas?

Fifth, would there be any "extra's" that those parts of the world have to take on? Would they be called upon later on to help even when they cannot? Help usually have strings attached, and they would force obligation on the beneficiary to return the favor at a later time.

Of course, if the parts of the world wants to be improved, and there is the resources and funds to do so, then yes, Roosevelt is right in "improving" those parts of the world.

~

nzkjfdhkdoxrvf

explanation:

cultural achievements of the 1920's 2010  

1. cultural achievements and african american achievements in the 1920’s  

2. art and literature charles lindberg flew from ny to paris, france. became national hero; first transatlantic flight.  

3. greenwich village (new york) and the south side (chicago)  many artists, writers, and intellectuals flocked to these areas to share ideas  people lead bohemian, or artistic and unconventional, lifestyles