Which statement describes a major difference between the international responses to genocide in bosnia and in rwanda? o a. ethnic cleansing in bosnia eventually escalated into a full-scale genocide, but ethnic cleansing in rwanda did not. o b. ethnic cleansing in rwanda took place over a period of several years, while ethnic cleansing in bosnia ended in a few months. o c. ethnic cleansing in rwanda was based primarily on religion, while ethnic cleansing in bosnia was based primarily on race. o d. ethnic cleansing in bosnia led to a military response from international forces, but ethnic cleansing in rwanda did not. im

D. Ethnic cleansing in Bosnia led to a military response from international forces, but ethnic cleansing in Rwanda did not

Explanation:

The genocides in Bosnia and Rwanda are part of the numerous genocides that took place in the past several decades. The genocide in Bosnia was initiated by Serbian nationalist, and it was toward the Muslims and the Croatians. The international community did reacted though to stop it, and sent its military forces in order to put things under control. The genocide in Rwanda though took another course. The Hutu started to perform genocide over the Tutsi minority, but the international community was hesitating should it react or not, if it does in which way, and while it was thinking the genocide was going on and on. Luckily for the Tutsi people, they had their own military forces that were well equipped, so they managed to stop the aggression form the Hutu before they made a full scale genocide.

first one the food administration

international economic development agencies harm poorer nations by encouraging them to serve as exporters to wealthier nations.