Both muir and carson’s pieces are about the environment. compare carson’s silent spring to muir’s “save the redwoods.” how are the two texts similar and how are they different? how are the authors’ arguments and styles similar and how are they different?

Both Muir and Carson advocate for the environment. Carson argues against the use of pesticides, while Muir argues against the logging of redwood trees, but both see the actions of humans as dangerous to the Earth and to humanity. Carson's approach is more scientific and she uses lots of facts and scientific studies as evidence. Muir's approach is more poetic, and he uses more emotion and religion as evidence. Both authors' approaches are effective in persuading their readers, and their texts helped cause significant changes in environmental law.

Hope this helps!!!

Please feel free to mark as brainliest:)