how did distance from rome likely affect people in the roman empire?

rome had less political control over people in distant provinces.
rome sent better goods and supplies to its far territories.
people further from rome had lower social status.
people closer to rome were more likely to hold political office.

Distance from Rome likely affect people in the Roman Empire as Rome had less political control over people in distant provinces.

Option A

Explanation:

The Roman Empire had a vast expanse and had in its possession all the areas neighbouring the Mediterranean Sea. According to the modern-day map of the world, the Roman Empire was spread in three different continents, that of Europe, Asia, and Africa.

An expanse this big made it difficult for the central administration functioning from Rome (the capital of the Roman Empire) to exercise control over areas as far as Caledonia and Hibernia in the northwest, and Aegyptus in the southeast of the empire.

for the 2 countries u can do china and america because america has a democratic government while china has a communist government.

a democracy is a government run by the people either by directly voting or indirectly by electing representatives. an oligarchy is a government run by a few or a small group of people. a democracy and oligarchy are similar because both in an oligarchy and an indirect democracy, a small group of induvial determine the laws for a large group of people they are different because in an oligarchy it is easier to control and they do not have to answer to a large number of people in the country, unlike a democracy where they do have to answer to a large number of people an county that is a democracy would be the united states. a country that is an oligarchy would be the china.